🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts regarding the remarks made by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz during the US Open last eight. Look – Fritz is American, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions frequently encourage nationalism. A little bit of letdown would have been understandable. Instead, he brought up the ongoing drought of US male players at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, myself included. But really. Suppose Fritz defeated the legend for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the following match, who Fritz has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven major titles (plus the Spaniard went on to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). He said in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact liked his path, because it presented the chance to beat the three best competitors in the sport back-to-back. He is well justified to aim for the achievement; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Serbian last eight match who else in their right mind had the drought of American champions in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the world entering this week’s year-end championships and has secured his last six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that is as far as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s elite serve and powerful power on each front side and backhand are sufficiently adequate to dispose of the majority of opponents on the ATP tour. Against the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, though, he is often helpless. The last several years has witnessed the curious rise of tall, gangly players who can nevertheless cover the court with the alarming speed and fluidity of much shorter players. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he seldom steal a point that the opponent was controlling, and playing a drop shot versus him is typically a safe bet. That serves as a pretty harsh limitation on his upside.

The American has made a several significant, unexpected advancements throughout his career. Early on of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months after, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded up to fourth place – and maintained the spot. But the next leap, competing against and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and including a aging Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing drought of US male players lifting grand slams when Fritz had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge too little.

The American star made a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s performance in that exact last eight match ought to have been enough of an sign. Djokovic won in four rounds, a win that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a few championship opportunities and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with the American earning numerous chances to break. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after service break opportunity, extending the run to the point of frustration. When Fritz finally did convert a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly produced a horrendous service game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the main contest and compelled him to expend far too much energy to prevail. Down set points in the final game, his primary delivery sailed to the sky. He prolonged the match twice on his second serve, but ultimately double-faulted. It was not a collapse, I didn’t think, only a consequence of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was fairly compelling evidence that the American is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of Djokovic, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the next round and never especially appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his athletic abilities now, but has developed enough knowledge and tactical know-how to make up for quite a bit of the decline. The problem is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was had not accomplished anything that suggested he could.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in media sessions, more so than almost anyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just say his emotions or the tactic he believed determined a contest, but clarify it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for America failing to spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist feels unfair. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, maybe they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Group

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely think about it forever if I don’t accomplish it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in the summer of claiming a major. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that goal, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's young, terrifying reign is in fact highly unlikely for all other players. {